Make.com Automation
I build Make.com scenarios that don't fall over. Multi-branch routers, proper error handling, rate-limit-aware scheduling, and clean data transformations — so your automation runs as a system, not a fragile chain of modules.
What I orchestrate
Webhook-driven pipelines that ingest leads, form submissions, and events in real time, then route them to the right CRM record, sheet, or notification.
Multi-branch logic that splits payloads by type — buyer vs. seller, new vs. returning, urgent vs. routine — and runs a different flow for each.
Scheduled syncs between tools that don't have native integrations, with deduplication and conflict handling built in.
Built to last
Every scenario has error routes, retry logic, and a place for failed operations to land so a single bad record doesn't break the whole flow.
Scenarios are documented and structured so another developer — or future-you — can read and extend them without reverse-engineering the logic.
Frequently asked
Make.com vs. native CRM automations — when do I use which?+
Use native CRM automations for simple, single-system triggers and follow-ups. Use Make.com the moment you need to cross system boundaries, branch on complex logic, or transform data between formats. I often combine both.
What happens when a Make scenario errors?+
I build error-handling routes that catch failures, log the offending record, and notify you — so the scenario keeps processing other records and you can fix the one that failed instead of restarting everything.
Can you optimize scenarios that consume too many operations?+
Yes. Most cost issues come from over-fetching, redundant searches, or running on schedules instead of webhooks. I refactor for operation efficiency without changing the outcome.